Administrator [MOW] (admin)
- Friday 14 February 2014 18:01
If you mean canopy-less (no canopy), no, never. It just looks that way in this shot because of this particular shot.
Administrator [MOW] (admin)
- Friday 14 February 2014 18:01
If you mean canopy-less (no canopy), no, never. It just looks that way in this shot because of this particular shot.
Administrator [MOW] (admin)
- Friday 14 February 2014 18:01
If you mean canopy-less (no canopy), no, never. It just looks that way in this shot because of this particular shot.
Administrator [MOW] (admin)
- Friday 14 February 2014 18:01
If you mean canopy-less (no canopy), no, never. It just looks that way in this shot because of this particular shot.
Administrator [MOW] (admin)
- Friday 14 February 2014 18:01
If you mean canopy-less (no canopy), no, never. It just looks that way in this shot because of this particular shot.
Administrator [MOW] (admin)
- Friday 14 February 2014 18:01
If you mean canopy-less (no canopy), no, never. It just looks that way in this shot because of this particular shot.
Administrator [MOW] (admin)
- Friday 14 February 2014 18:01
If you mean canopy-less (no canopy), no, never. It just looks that way in this shot because of this particular shot.
Administrator [MOW] (admin)
- Friday 14 February 2014 18:01
If you mean canopy-less (no canopy), no, never. It just looks that way in this shot because of this particular shot.
Administrator [MOW] (admin)
- Friday 14 February 2014 18:01
If you mean canopy-less (no canopy), no, never. It just looks that way in this shot because of this particular shot.
Bill Ott
- Friday 14 February 2014 15:59
I just want to know, is this plane really cockpitless, and if so why, and if so how often. I am not an air force veteran, have come this photo many times, and always wonder about this open air ride.